Read the full report here

Investment Under a Bitcoin Standard: How Hard Money Rewrites the Rules of Capital Allocation

After more than half a century of fiat money, and over a century since the end of the Classical Gold Standard, it can be difficult to imagine a world in which money preserves or gains purchasing power over time. In such a world, people save in currency rather than being forced to speculate simply to maintain their wealth. Yet this was normal for much of the late 19th century: during the Classical Gold Standard era, currencies backed by gold gradually appreciated in real terms as productivity rose and prices fell gently over time.

We believe that Bitcoin is on a multi-decade path to becoming a global reserve asset, absorbing the monetary premium currently embedded in non-monetary assets like bonds, real estate, and equities. Understanding what investment looks like on that journey, and at the destination, is one of the more important analytical exercises for any serious capital allocator today.

Time Preference: Why the Soundness of Money Shapes Everything

Every monetary system carries an implicit view of time. When money is easy to create, rising demand leads to more issuance, and producers are rewarded for expanding supply. Tomorrow's unit buys less than today's, and savers are pushed to spend or speculate just to preserve purchasing power. When the monetary base is hard, as under the Classical Gold Standard or Bitcoin, supply cannot expand in response to demand. Money holds or gains value, and people become more willing to save and plan for the future.

Economists call the rate at which people discount the future their time preference. It is always positive, since the future is uncertain. But when money is debased, individuals discount the future heavily. When money is sound, they discount it less. When simply holding money offers a real return, the hurdle rate for new investment rises. Capital becomes more selective. Investors require a meaningful spread above the return on money to compensate them for taking risk.

Under fiat money, the opposite dynamic operates. From 1959 to 2025, U.S. M2 money stock grew roughly 6.8% per year on average. During 2020 and 2021, the money supply grew by 26% and 11% respectively, forcing investors to chase nominal returns above those figures simply to preserve purchasing power. Artificially low interest rates and the declining future value of cash distort capital allocation by inflating the present value of future cash flows, making low-returning projects appear more attractive than they truly are. The result is persistent misallocation of capital, inflated asset bubbles, and destroyed value when promised returns fail to materialize.

Bitcoin's monetary policy is hard-coded. Its issuance schedule is public and immutable. Its supply is perfectly inelastic to demand. This makes it an even sounder store of value than gold, whose supply has historically expanded 1 to 2% per year through mining. Holding money that genuinely appreciates over time changes everything about how investors think, plan, and allocate.

Lessons from the Gold Standard Era

The Classical Gold Standard from 1870 to 1914 offers the best historical model for what investing under a Bitcoin Standard might eventually look like. During that period, national currencies were convertible into gold at fixed rates, anchoring a global system of trade and finance. Governments that honored convertibility could borrow at narrow spreads; those that suspended it paid far higher rates. Sovereign debt was not risk-free in the modern sense because states could not print their own money. To maintain credibility, they were forced to run balanced budgets and maintain high reserve ratios.

Between 1870 and 1913, real short-term interest rates across major economies averaged roughly 2 to 3 percent. Prices drifted gently downward by about half a percent per year. Wages were relatively static in nominal terms but rose in real purchasing power. Despite frequent recessions, real GDP per capita in Britain, the United States, and Germany grew steadily at roughly 1 to 2 percent annually, financed largely through retained earnings and genuine savings rather than credit expansion. Contrary to modern fears, mild deflation did not paralyze investment. It simply set a higher hurdle rate for returns.

The investment architecture of that era was naturally conservative. Investors preferred instruments that guaranteed repayment in gold. Equities were often regarded as speculative rather than core holdings. Ordinary savers could save in currency without needing to risk capital just to protect it from debasement. Prior to fiat money, finance and banking were considered safe and dull professions rather than risky and adventurous ones.

Culturally, the gold standard era coincided with remarkable confidence in long-term investment. Bridges, railways, and universities were financed by long-term private savings accumulated under sound money. Compare that to the early 21st century: meme stocks, negative-yielding debt, financial engineering on an industrial scale, and steadily declining trust in institutions. The form of money itself shaped the texture of capitalism and, by extension, society.

What Investment Looks Like Under a Mature Bitcoin Standard

Suppose the multi-decade monetization of Bitcoin is complete. Volatility in purchasing power has subsided, and every major institution measures value in Bitcoin terms. What does finance and investment look like?

The answer begins with an inversion of today's logic. Under a mature Bitcoin Standard, saving is the default and investing is optional. For the median household, this is liberating: there is no need to allocate savings to leveraged real estate or risky equities just to preserve purchasing power. Most individuals simply hold Bitcoin securely. Credit remains available, but at costs that reflect genuine scarcity of capital rather than central bank manipulation, making it significantly less common than today.

For businesses, capital allocation becomes far more disciplined. With the cost of capital reflecting the real return on money, holding idle balances is no longer penalized by inflation. Investment committees scrutinize projects for their ability to generate durable, Bitcoin-denominated free cash flow. Share buybacks and acquisitions are approached cautiously. The result is a culture of prudence: firms reinvest selectively, maintain stronger balance sheets, and treat every unit of retained earnings as scarce and genuinely valuable capital.

For investors, a mature Bitcoin Standard makes investing boring again, in the best sense. With a risk-free asset offering a real return for the first time in decades, there is no longer any need to chase yield simply to avoid debasement. Equity markets and indices still exist, but they attract a smaller proportion of total wealth. Most investment capital flows to opportunities where investors have genuine expertise and understanding of the underlying business. A larger savings base allows entrepreneurs to bootstrap ventures without needing multiple funding rounds. Growth is typically funded by reinvested retained earnings rather than serial venture capital rounds. Debt is less widespread, not only because it adds brittleness to balance sheets, but because servicing debt becomes harder in a deflationary world.

Valuation multiples likely compress to the conservative levels seen in the early industrial age: price-earnings ratios in the low teens, price-book ratios near 1x, and dividend yields above bond yields. Derivative markets shrink dramatically without free-floating currencies and central bank manipulation. Finance itself becomes more commoditized, closer to a utility than an industry. The central figure in this world is not the financial engineer. It is the entrepreneur.

Ventures on a Bitcoin Standard

The venture capital model also changes fundamentally. With the end of artificially cheap capital, less funding flows into speculative, loss-making ventures, while more supports steady, compounding businesses that build genuine value year after year. Entrepreneurs are incentivized to reach profitability early rather than funding indefinite periods of cash burn through multiple follow-on rounds.

Founders with sound business ideas will be able to save long enough to fund their own ventures. Many businesses will take no outside capital at all, as founders with genuinely good ideas will prefer to retain the rewards of their work rather than dilute ownership to cover speculative burn. When founders do seek outside capital, they look for investors with domain expertise who can add strategic value beyond the capital itself.

The total amount of capital available for higher-risk ventures likely decreases, but the venture success rate increases. The high time preference mentality of moving fast and breaking things gives way to slower, more purposeful building, funded only by people with deep expertise in the relevant domain. Capital efficiency becomes more important than capital availability.

Investing During Bitcoin's Monetization Phase

The monetization phase, the period we are currently in, is the hardest era to navigate. Bitcoin's price in fiat terms will remain unstable. Speculation and leveraged trades will continue to dominate over short time horizons. But over longer time horizons, volatility will diminish as the user base deepens and price stability increases.

The monetization phase poses a specific challenge for investors: any investment funded in fiat must beat Bitcoin both nominally and in Bitcoin terms to create real value. If a venture cannot deliver more Bitcoin in the future than it consumed in capital today, it is a misallocation. This is a far tougher hurdle than investing under a mature Bitcoin Standard, when adoption no longer drives Bitcoin's real return.

The investors and businesses best positioned during this phase will share a few characteristics: operational excellence, revenue exposure to fast-growing industries, and the discipline to use Bitcoin as their implicit hurdle rate. Truly exceptional businesses can outperform Bitcoin on their own merits. But most outperformance in the monetization era will require alignment with Bitcoin's adoption curve or genuine operational edge, not financial engineering.

Bitcoin itself becomes the hurdle rate. Every investment must prove it is worth more than holding the hardest asset on earth.

The Business Categories Built for This Moment

Certain categories of Bitcoin infrastructure represent structural opportunities during the monetization phase. Their revenues and profits grow with Bitcoin's adoption while their costs remain denominated in fiat that loses value against Bitcoin over time. They are effectively high-beta plays on Bitcoin's own monetization.

• Trading infrastructure: Prime brokerages, exchanges, market makers, and derivatives providers that will see significant growth as more institutions seek Bitcoin exposure and capital market depth.
• Custodians: Multi-institutional custody, institutional key management, multisig wallets, and hardware wallets. These are the modern equivalents of 19th-century merchant banks. They grow with adoption and monetize through custody fees and complementary services.
• Lending markets: Technology providers and loan servicers offering fiat-based credit for overcollateralized Bitcoin, as individuals and institutions use holdings to service fiat-denominated obligations without selling.
• Treasury management solutions: Firms offering streamlined access to Bitcoin, dollars, stablecoins, money market funds, and higher-yielding assets will benefit from significant institutional demand as treasury management evolves.
• Security infrastructure: Both Bitcoin-native key management and adjacent security services will perform well as the importance of securing private information scales with adoption.
• Energy and mining adjacencies: Firms that arbitrage stranded or intermittent power to Bitcoin mining capture a structural economic advantage.
• Payment and settlement layers: Lightning and similar protocols create fee markets and liquidity pools that monetize routing efficiency. Businesses providing liquidity, risk tools, or analytics at these layers capture expanding network throughput.
• Mining pools and infrastructure: Those who aggregate global hashrate, optimize block construction, and take a small fee on every reward. Efficient, non-custodial pools with strong reputations can expand hashrate share faster than the network itself.

The most successful Bitcoin companies may develop business models with no analog in the fiat world. This list is illustrative, not exhaustive. The structural logic is what matters: alignment with Bitcoin's monetization creates a natural revenue tailwind while costs deflate in Bitcoin terms over time.

The Takeaway

Bitcoin is often miscategorized by Wall Street as a technology asset, something that should trade like the NASDAQ or semiconductor stocks. In reality, it represents a return to the principles of sound money and a modern solution to humanity's oldest financial challenge: how to preserve value across time without debasement.

A world on a Bitcoin Standard would more closely resemble the disciplined capital markets of the Classical Gold Standard era than the perpetual-stimulus, negative-real-yield environment that has characterized recent decades. When money retains or gains value, capital allocation becomes more discerning, and stable, profitable enterprises are favored over speculative, loss-making ones. For investors, Bitcoin itself becomes the hurdle rate.

The challenge for investors today is not how to allocate capital under a mature Bitcoin Standard. It is how to deploy capital wisely during Bitcoin's rapid monetization phase. Those aligned with its monetization will have a structural advantage. The most defensible position of all remains direct Bitcoin ownership alongside investments that can genuinely clear the hurdle rate it sets.

Under a Bitcoin Standard, the cost of money once again reflects the cost of time. Every investment must prove it is worth more than holding the hardest asset on earth.

Read the full report here