Read the full report here

Bitcoin's Full Potential Valuation: A Framework for Understanding Bitcoin's Long-Term Ceiling

Most conversations about Bitcoin get lost in the details: which altcoin is better, what the latest regulatory development means, whether this cycle will repeat the last one. We spend enormous energy on questions that, in the long run, matter very little, while neglecting the most fundamental question of all: how high can this go? Where is the ceiling for Bitcoin?

This question requires stepping back from the noise and asking something more basic: what is Bitcoin's value proposition, really? What market is it competing in? How big is that market? And given Bitcoin's unique properties as an asset, what fraction of that market could it realistically attract? The answers lead to a conclusion that is, frankly, difficult to believe at first. But the logic is rigorous, the math is simple, and the framework is one that any investor can run themselves.

What Market Is Bitcoin Competing In?

Most people think of Bitcoin as a currency, and while that framing captures something true, it also causes confusion. Bitcoin is more precisely a store-of-value asset, the digital analogue of gold, designed to improve on gold's core strengths while solving for gold's most significant weaknesses. This means that Bitcoin is not competing in a payments industry or a banking industry or a currency issuance industry. It is competing in the market for value itself: the global store-of-value asset market.

We are unaccustomed to thinking about store-of-value assets as a market. We think in terms of industries where companies compete and customers pay. But the economy also produces value, and that value has to be stored somewhere. It gets parked in assets: gold, bonds, real estate, equities, and many others. These assets vary considerably in how effectively they preserve and grow the purchasing power of what is stored in them. Some appreciate, some maintain, some slowly lose ground to inflation.

Bitcoin is competing with all of them. Any asset that stores value better than the alternatives can attract capital away from every other asset category. That makes Bitcoin's total addressable market not a sector, not an industry, but the entire global balance sheet.

"Bitcoin is a 'store-of-value' asset, like gold. In truth, Bitcoin is 'digital gold' -- designed to improve on gold's strengths and solve for gold's weaknesses. Its market is value itself." -- Jesse Myers

What Sets the Ceiling for Asset Valuations?

Different assets have different ceilings: the percentage of the global asset pie they could realistically ever represent. This is because each asset category's valuation is constrained by the variables specific to its own pricing mechanism.

Company valuations are constrained by two primary inputs: expected future cash flows and the discount rate applied to those cash flows. Lower interest rates expand company valuations by making future earnings more valuable in present terms. Real estate is similar: valuations are constrained by expected rental income, mortgage rates that determine how much debt buyers can service, and the pace of new supply creation. When real estate prices rise, builders create more supply, which eventually constrains further appreciation.

Commodity valuations work differently. Interest rates are not the primary input. What constrains commodity prices is the rate at which new supply enters the market. For gold, the global mining effort collectively adds approximately 2% per year to above-ground supply. At roughly $12 trillion in total above-ground gold, this means the global market must absorb approximately $240 billion in new supply every single year just to keep the gold price where it is. That constant gravitational pressure is what keeps gold's valuation anchored.

Bitcoin is a commodity in important ways, but with one property that makes it structurally unlike any commodity that has ever existed: its new supply issuance is cut in half every four years, permanently, by design, and no one on earth has the power to change that schedule.

Increasing Scarcity: The Property That Changes Everything

In 2016, Bitcoin's annual supply growth rate was approximately 3.6%. By 2020, it was 1.8%. Following the April 2024 halving, it dropped to approximately 0.9%. In 2028, it will be approximately 0.45%. This process continues, halving every four years, until the final Bitcoin is issued in 2140. The total supply is capped at 21 million coins and cannot be changed by any authority, any government, or any majority vote.

The implications for valuation are profound. For gold and other commodities, new supply acts like gravity on the price: it creates constant downward pressure that limits how high valuations can sustainably go. For Bitcoin, that gravitational force is cut in half every four years. The variable that typically constrains commodity valuations is, for Bitcoin, systematically approaching zero. What ultimately sets Bitcoin's price ceiling is therefore not a supply constraint but something else entirely: how attractive Bitcoin is as a store-of-value asset relative to all alternatives.

This gives Bitcoin a property that is genuinely unprecedented in the history of money and assets: it gets more valuable over time by design. Gold is good at preserving purchasing power. Bitcoin is designed to grow it, because value stored in Bitcoin becomes more scarce relative to demand with each successive halving. You simply have to outlast the volatility that comes with being early to an asset in the early stages of global adoption.

"Bitcoin has an unthinkable property: it gets more valuable over time. Value stored in Bitcoin becomes worth more because of its design of increasing scarcity -- you just have to outlast the volatility along the way." -- Jesse Myers

Two Firsts: Absolute Scarcity and Increasing Scarcity

Before Bitcoin, digital scarcity did not exist. In the digital realm, information can be copied and replicated at zero marginal cost. Everything on the internet is infinitely reproducible. Bitcoin's foundational breakthrough was the invention of a digital system in which something genuinely could not be duplicated: a digital bearer asset enforced by cryptography and a decentralized network of computers operating under rules that no single entity controls.

This breakthrough enabled Bitcoin to implement two properties that have never previously existed in combination in any asset, physical or digital. The first is absolute scarcity: there is a fixed maximum supply of 21 million Bitcoin that can ever exist, and this limit is enforced by the protocol itself. The second is increasing scarcity: that fixed supply is released into circulation at a rate that decreases exponentially over time, following the halving schedule. Supply issuance is perfectly inelastic to demand. No matter how much demand there is for Bitcoin, the network will issue exactly the same amount of new coins it was going to issue regardless. This inelastic supply curve is periodically shifted halfway to zero, causing price to find a new equilibrium between declining supply and growing demand.

Every other cryptocurrency is, at its core, a copy of Bitcoin's system of digital scarcity dressed up with different features. But a copy of a system of digital scarcity does not inherit the properties of the original. Bitcoin's value rests on being the original: the one network and asset that was first, that survived, that accumulated the network effects, the hash rate, the liquidity, the institutional adoption, and the regulatory clarity that 15 years of proven existence produces. As David Marcus, the former head of Facebook's cryptocurrency project, concluded after thousands of hours of research into alternatives: Bitcoin is the only asset that fits the bill when you want a true, open, interoperable protocol for money on the internet built on something that literally no one controls.

The Global Asset Landscape: $900 Trillion in Stored Value

To understand Bitcoin's full potential valuation, it is necessary to understand the scale of what it is competing against. A comprehensive picture of the global asset landscape, aggregating estimates across asset categories, yields something in the range of $900 trillion in total stored value worldwide. This encompasses global real estate (approximately $330 trillion), equities (approximately $100 trillion), bonds (approximately $130 trillion), gold (approximately $12 trillion), fiat currency and bank deposits, and other assets including art, collectibles, commodities, and private assets.

At the time of writing, Bitcoin's total market capitalization represents approximately $0.5 trillion, or roughly 0.05% of that $900 trillion. That is one two-thousandth of the world's stored value.

Bitcoin's total addressable market is the entire $900 trillion. This is not a marketing claim. It is the logical consequence of Bitcoin's value proposition: if Bitcoin is the best store-of-value asset in the investable landscape, and if investors allocate based on the asset's ability to preserve and grow purchasing power over time, then capital from every other asset category is, in principle, eligible to migrate to Bitcoin. Bitcoin is a black hole on the world's balance sheet. Any asset that stores value more effectively than the alternatives exerts gravitational pull on all others.

Bitcoin's Full Potential Valuation

Bitcoin enthusiasts sometimes make the mistake of claiming Bitcoin's valuation potential is infinite. In dollar terms, this is literally true, since there is no limit to how much currency debasement can occur. But in real terms, relative to other assets, it is not useful. Bitcoin stands in genuine competition with other store-of-value categories, each of which has real value propositions for specific use cases and investor types.

A more useful framework is to estimate, asset category by asset category, what percentage of the capital stored in each could realistically migrate to Bitcoin as the world comes to understand its properties. This exercise requires assumptions, and reasonable people will disagree about the specific percentages. But the structure of the analysis is straightforward: estimate what fraction of bonds, of fiat savings, of gold, of equities, and of real estate could plausibly re-allocate to Bitcoin, multiply by the total value in each category, sum the results, and divide by 21 million coins.

When this framework is applied with conservative estimates: for instance, that Bitcoin captures 30% of the value currently stored in bonds and fiat currency (given the scale of monetary debasement that will be necessary to service mounting sovereign debts), 50% of gold's market (given Bitcoin's superior portability, divisibility, verifiability, and programmatic scarcity), and smaller percentages from equities and real estate, the result is a full potential valuation of approximately $10 million per Bitcoin in today's dollars.

"My conservative estimates suggest an outrageous full potential for Bitcoin's price: $10 million per Bitcoin, in today's dollars. Bitcoin's full potential is to eat approximately 20% of the world's value -- while today it constitutes just 0.05%." -- Jesse Myers

The Expected Value Case

$10 million per Bitcoin in today's dollars implies something in the range of a 400x from Bitcoin's current price in real, inflation-adjusted terms. This is the conclusion of a conservative framework, not an optimistic one. The estimate is grounded in Bitcoin capturing roughly 20% of the world's stored value, a fraction that may seem large but is less than what a single asset class like real estate or bonds already holds today.

This is not guaranteed. No investment outcome is. But consider the expected value framing: even if there is only a 10% probability that this analysis is correct, the expected value of a Bitcoin position is a 50x. Few assets in the investable landscape offer asymmetric expected value of this magnitude.

Paul Tudor Jones put it plainly: Bitcoin is literally the only large tradeable asset in the world with a known fixed maximum supply. The combination of fixed supply and increasing demand, as adoption continues its still-early arc, produces a return expectation that no other asset can match. Saifedean Ammous, author of The Bitcoin Standard, described Bitcoin as uniquely suited to play the role gold played in the gold standard: a neutral money for an international system that does not give any one country the exorbitant privilege of issuing the global reserve currency.

If the analysis here is anywhere close to correct, the relevant question for every investor is not whether to own Bitcoin. It is whether they own enough.

The Practical Question

Bitcoin is an excellent savings technology for any value that needs to be propagated through time without dilution and with the potential for real purchasing power growth. The flywheel is already in motion: Bitcoin's increasing scarcity creates the conditions for appreciation, appreciation attracts new adopters, new adopters drive demand against fixed supply, and demand growing against declining new issuance drives further appreciation. This is not speculation about future features. It is the mechanical consequence of Bitcoin's existing design, playing out in real time, one halving at a time.

The world currently holds $900 trillion in assets. Bitcoin represents 0.05% of that. If even a small fraction of the world's investors reach the same conclusions that BlackRock, Fidelity, Paul Tudor Jones, and a growing number of sovereign wealth funds and pension plans are reaching about Bitcoin's properties as a store-of-value asset, the reallocation of even a few additional percentage points of global wealth into Bitcoin produces price outcomes that are difficult to process intuitively.

The question worth sitting with is not whether Bitcoin can get there. The question is whether you will have a position when it does. Onramp provides the institutional-grade custody infrastructure, from Multi-Institution Custody to estate planning and Bitcoin-backed lending, to hold a serious Bitcoin position with the security, transparency, and financial integration it deserves.

Read the full report here